Dorante-Day vs. Windsor and Shand Family : the Truth!
In 2003 Ms Leanne Dorante-Day died in her sleep from complications relating to to Asthma at age 14. The aim of sharing this story is to bring awareness to the wider public of the public health issue relating to the issue of Asthma among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Communities. Click on Elvianna's website to view more on Leanne's mother Mrs Elvianna Dorante-Day (nee Dorante)
Sorry Business is on-going for those who suffer the loss.... our children also suffer from the human right violations we Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people continue to endure...from reckless construction of public health policies in Australia relating to Best Practice in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health in particular that of the Children.
Click below to view resources relating to Asthma and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities.
Not only did this child die in what the family considers a horrific manner, the violation's before and following her death just added to the pain of her loss and continued human violations following her birth and after it. Has her death got to do with her being Indigenous Australian or is her death related to the fact that her step-father is Mr Simon Dorante-Day and his true identity is that he is the son of Prince Charles and the Duchess of Cornwall Carmilla (nee Shand) - also known as Camilla Parker Bowles whose marriage occurred on 9 April 2005 at a civil ceremony at the Guildhall in Windsor, followed by a service of prayer and dedication in St. George's Chapel, Windsor Castle. Is this why Princess Diana died, because she found out the real truth, and was going to reveal it to the world, and Mr Simon Dorante-Day did submit a statement to the Operation Paget investigation which was accepted by the Metropolitan Police in the UK for further investigation informing them of the fact that he could be the biological child of Prince Charles and Duchess of Cornwall. After the unexpected conception of Mr Simon Dorante-Day (nee Day) via his biological mother Duchess of Cornwall Carmilla (nee Shand) - also known as Camilla Parker Bowles, his father Prince Charles was sent to further his education in Australia. So in fact Prince Charles was a teenager when he became a father. Mark Shand is another family member whose appearance looks very much similar to that of Mr Simon Charles Dorante-Day. Mark Shand is the brother of Duchess of Cornwall Carmilla (nee Shand).
Another connection to this issue is the fact that Mr Simon Charles Dorante-Day (nee Day) adopted family (adopted grandparents Earnest and Winifred Bowleden) in the United Kingdom were employed by the Royal Household in the United Kingdom. Earnest Bowleden received an Imperial Service medal from Queen Elizabeth for duties to the Royal Household.
So in regards to the tampering of the appearance of Mr Simon Charles Dorante-Day when he was a child, who of the Royal family ordered for the changes to occur. The changing of the colour of his eyes from blue to brown at age 7, and the movement of Simon to another school following the changes to the colour of his eyes. In a video interview of his adopted mother Karen Day, Karen states that the colour of his eyes were blue but changed to brown when he was 7. Simon in fact can remember at this age that both of his eyes experienced irritation and discomfort for a period of time. Simon states he was unable to withstand not only the sunlight but the intensity of an 100 watt lightbulb. This Simon states was an extremely painful experience, and during this time his adopted mother Karen Day treated his painful eyes with regular doses of Aspirin. Was the United Kingdom government at the time of this incident also involved in ordering for the eye colour changes to occur to Simon as a child, and to what extent was the Anglican church in the United Kingdom involved. "Thou shalt not lie" - is one of the ten commandments, and for how long have they violated this Law of God??? What else did Simon have to endure as a child to hid the lies of others??? How really were his human rights as a child violated?? Did he have any human rights as a child??
"Charlie ears, Charlie ears" was the taunt that Simon stated he endured as a child from other children following the tampering of his eyes, and the movement to the new school. Funny enough as he aged the ears appeared to have reversed in protrusion, or again was this by surgical/medical intervention when Simon was a child. In fact Simon can remember being admitted into a United Kingdom hospital for tonsillitis treatment on many occasions
At age 14 Simon stated that the tips of both incisors of his front top teeth were filed down. In fact Simon has a photograph showing the incisors, before they were removed. Why did this occur is the real question????
Genetics is an interesting field particularly when your parents genes can also be passed onto your own children, as Simon discovered after the birth of his fourth child. As this child aged her ears became the exact identical in appearence and structure to Prince Charles ears.
This is an issue that the Dorante-Day family has been investigating for the past six years. This issue has involved both the Australian and British governments including the Royal Family of the UK and legal action is currently being pursued in regards to this issue.
United Kingdom Legislation reviewed in our investigation
The recent announcement of Prince William And Kate Middleton engagement does not change the fact that already Simon and Elvianna Dorante-Day are legally married and have 6 children who already threaten the current positioning of the members of the Royal family of the United Kingdom's . The children consist of 3 boys aged 16, 14 and 4 years, and 3 girls aged 7, 5 and 1 years. More on Simon Dorante-Day life story can be found Here
Is this why the University of Western Sydney did illegal head scans of our daughters aged 6 and 4 years old which occurred in 2009. Did they too want to prove or disprove whether Simon Charles Dorante- Day (nee Day) was the child of Prince Charles and the Duchess of Cornwall Carmilla (nee Shand). What's even worse is how the University ascertained the data, through using the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander research arena. This occurred at the MARCS Auditory Laboratories, a University of Western Sydney Research Centre at UWS where a disgruntled family member was working, and knew that we were investigation whether Prince Charles and the Duchess of Cornwall Carmilla (nee Shand). are the biological parents of Mr Simon Dorante-Day. At no time did we recieve the results of the head scans as promised by MARCS Auditory Laboratories, a University of Western Sydney Research Centre We have informed the UK and Australian governments that this has occurred, and the university is currently under ARC investigation
An example of what the Dorante-Day family is enduring because of what we are investigating can be found @ the following Facebook links
Fake Profile of Elvianna - This profile is fake and NOT Elvianna's - see how it is associated with the Fake Nations Page
Elvianna Marella Dorante-Day - WARNING this is a FAKE profile
Blogs that have been used to attack and contaminate the reputation of members of the Dorante-Day family by some members of the Indigenous Australian community. With the level of violence already occurring within some Indigenous Australian communities, will the exposure to the internet increase this level of violence, and how widespread will this violence be spread.....in our case it has been both nationally and internationally
Indigenous Facebook Violations (now deleted)
Not to mention threats by Elders such as Jimmy Little, and his family.
To see document from Jimmy Little Click Here
To see the Jimmy Little Facebook row article click Here
These document has been used to misrepresent and incite anger against the Dorante-Day family, and threats to their physical, mental and social well-being, and this information is in the hands of the relevant Police bodies here in Australia.
What's even more scary about the way in which Jimmy Little has attacked the Dorante-Day family is the fact that he has been in operation of the Jimmy Little Charity Foundation - click Here to view Foundation. This Foundation relies on public donations, and after what we the Dorante-Day family have endured we question the operation of this foundation, ethically and otherwise, especially in view of the fact that Mr Little has little to no health credentials
United Nations Articles violated in the attacks on the Dorante-Day family both nationally and internationally (Facebook is American owned)
Click Here to view Declaration of Human Rights
Article 1; Article 2; Article 3; Article 5; Article 6; Article 7; Article 8; Article 11; Article 12; Article 13; Article 14; Article 15; Article 16; Article 17; Article 18; Article 19; Article 21; Article 22; Article 23; Article 24; Article 25; Article 26; Article 27; Article 28; Article 29.
Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States of America are all signatory to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and as such the Dorante-Day family will be launching a complaint under the Optional Protocol to the ICCPR as Article 2 has been all but exhausted and Article 5.2b applies due to the unreasonable delays encountered. The Article under which the complaint are to be lodged are:
Article 1,1.2,1.3, Article 2, Article 7, Article 9, 9.1, 9.4, 9.5, Article 11, Article 12.1, Article 14.1, 14.2a,b &d, 14.7, Article 15.1, Article 16, Article 17.1, 17.2, Article 18.1, 18.2, Article 19.1, 19.2, 19.3a & b, Article 20.2, Article 21, Article 22.1, 22.2, Article 24.1, Article 25a, Article 26 and Article 27.
We have on many occasions requested Facebook for these Facebook page to be removed as it endangers the well-being of the members of the Dorante-Day family, and these requests have been denied, and this further endangers our lives. This attack also makes me question as a Public health clinician the negative effects of Social network use among the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population. Which family/ies from the Indigenous communities of Australia will be their next victim?? Via Facebook fake Simon, Keshia and Elvianna profiles (employees of this journal) were created and our business FB pages attacked by the fake profiles, again another issue which has not been adequately addressed by Facebook.
For your information the following links have been added to demonstrate what can legally be achieved with this issue.
Judge grants full hearing into Princess Margaret's 'love child'
By CHARLOTTE GILL Last updated at 22:09 24 October 2006
Princess Margaret 'was my mother'
By Alan Hamilton October 25, 2006
Margaret's 'illegitimate son' takes his case to the High Court
By Robert Verkaik, Legal Affairs Correspondent Saturday, 21 October 2006
Princess's 'Son' Fails In Court Case
12:28am UK, Friday July 06, 2007
'Royal love child' wins appeal over Princess Margaret's will
Last updated at 14:05 17 October 2007
Royal claimant returns to court
Last Updated: Monday, 21 January 2008
Accountant gets to argue case on unsealing Queen Mother's will
February 8, 2008